In the present experiment, you will be asked to choose repeatedly between a fixed amount of money and a lottery. The lottery will always give you a chance to win one of two amounts of money. Figure 1 shows a typical choice task. You are asked repeatedly to choose between playing the lottery and obtaining a sure amount of money. For each row, you are asked to indicate whether you would prefer to play the lottery or to obtain the sure amount of money by ticking the preferred option.A sample risk survey question runs thus:
How do you see yourself? Are you generally a person who is fully willing to take risks or do you try to avoid taking risks? Please tick a box on the scale below, where 0 means “risk averse” and 10 means “fully prepared to take risks”:
A brief of the results obtained from the study.
Does a correlation or association exist between the two different techniques above i.e the incentivized lottery and the survey question?
When it comes to risk premium, does a relation exist, in absolute values?
Does a relation exist between risky gains and risky losses?
What do biology, study majors and macroeconomics reveal?
A correlation does exist that cuts across individuals and countries when considering risk and uncertainty attitudes, but the strength of this association is somewhat variable and could be affected by cultural factors within countries.
Risk premium, in this case, is defined as the expected value of a prospect or lottery minus the sure amount of money. Most persons in Western countries (except the UK) were considered to be risk averse while people in developing countries were found to be typically risk seeking. Countries considered very risk seeking were Nigeria and Nicaragua and to a lesser degree, Ethiopia, Vietnam and Peru. It was found that individuals who are willing to take risks are less willing to take an insurance policy.
It was decided that persons who are willing to take risks when there is a possibility of gains are highly likely to take risks when there are possibilities of losses. There seems to exist an underlying component of risk attitudes.
An association was found between gender and risk preferences, with women generally more risk averse than men. As to age, weak and inconsistent effects were discovered.
Where it concerns study majors, persons who study the Arts are generally risk seeking but seem to be risk averse when it comes to financial risks. Mathematics and natural science majors tended to be less or equivalent risk takers compared to economists while students of the Humanities and Social Sciences tend to be reluctant to accept risks. In the field of sports, persons from rich countries are more willing to take risks. People from countries with low GDP per capita compared to the United States tend to be more willing to accept uncertainty. In general, when it concerns uncertainty attitudes, there is a clear relation between most contexts (or risk areas) and domains (areas of gains or losses).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments here.